Puppeteering's Final Breath
The most striking example was the intervening of Bush himself in Libby's case. But when I read this BBC article this morning, I couldn't help but feel a little nauseated:
US plans huge Mid-East arms deal
What strikes me, is how the phrasing of their goals is becoming increasingly less covert. "US interest in the ME and the kind of ME we want to see"
Hang on a wee second. Surely arms (if they should happen at all) ought not to be based on what the US wants the world to be? Where is the UN response in this. It appears to me that the major institutes that once represented a healthy democratic sound aim for our World have been eroded away quite successfully by the US over the last two decades.
I personally find it shocking that such direct statements do not rouse more reaction from the general public. We might have had the (unfounded) excuse and pretense of not knowing what the real aims of US policy were in previouw decades, but surely, in this day and age, with such little attempt to cover up their policies and such disregard for global regulation, we have no more excuses for pretending we didn't know.
1 Comments:
The problem is that they are being bullies and they know that even though countries all over the world condemn them and their action, they know that facing them would bring out a very complicated situation in the world which, if armed power is compared, they have the upper hand. No one says anything *really* (like they deserve) because they fear that step could cause something even worse. Bullies, that's what they are and they take advantage of that power position.
Post a Comment
<< Home